« NaMaProMo | Main | The Beauty of Kid Nation »

Summoned

December 6, 2007 :: :: Journal | Textuality

I can't tell you how excited I am about the summons I received yesterday to serve on a federal jury. I got one about a year ago informing me that I would be on call for a whole year, and now I guess I'm on call for a couple of months.

Truthfully, though, I have mixed feelings. While I do want to serve, I have always held that I personally would never want to be tried by a jury of my "peers." Not to sound snobbish or anything, but have you spoken with the average citizen lately? No? Here's a sociological experiment for you: Spend a little time hanging out in the snowblower aisle at Home Depot, and just eavesdrop for five or ten minutes. Now, would you want any of those jackholes deciding whether or not you're going to do time in prison? For that matter, would you want me making that decision? I didn't think so.

Less terrifying but more headache-inducing is the thought of deciding someone else's fate along with 11 other mouthbreathers you might see peeling back the bun and inspecting their slider at White Castle. I've seen enough Matlock to know exactly who's on those juries. The businessman who thinks the whole thing is cut-and-dry (guilty-as-charged!) and just wants to get back to work. The elderly black lady who spends the whole time knitting and slowly shaking her head. The middle-class housewife who's too timid to give her opinion. The guy in the red flannel shirt, who at the end of the trial we find out is actually the killer!

These concerns dampen but don't nullify my enthusiasm. As I said, I am excited to serve. Mainly because I'm the type of person who likes to be in on things. I like to know all the details. The story behind the story. And I enjoy being a good citizen.

The $40 per day, and $.97 milage, though, not to mention the chance to eat in the courthouse cafeteria, that's the sweet part of the deal.

Comments

Unfortunately, compared to state court jury trials, federal court jury trials are usually snoozers.

"Did the defendant infringe?" "Did the employer fail to provide reasonable accommodation?" "Did the defendant use the U.S. mails to conduct fraud?"

OK, you might have a personal interest in that last one, but otherwise ... yawn.

No murder, no mayhem. Not even a car accident case with broken bones and soft tissue injuries.

I don't mean to be Debbie Downer, but from what I've heard, you'd be lucky to not get the call.

Does this mean, though, that you get to take more than two, non-consecutive, days off in the next month? Will you get a break from the parcle sorting? That in itself would get me excited methinks.

Diatribes: I don't *want* to be on a murder/mayhem trial. I don't want to see gruesome photos, or hear about any kind of rapings, or listen to any explanations about harm coming to children. I don't want that shit in my brain. I'm perfectly fine with the boring stuff. I like boring stuff.

Bags: No, the jury duty is for January and February, not December.

Lame sauce. Sorry man.

This is good news! Maybe you will get lucky and be on the jury for a federal drug case! I dream of such an invitation.

Congrats.

Don't forget the grizzled old retiree who has "seen it all" and the young secretary with big boobs who distracts the lawyers. Oh, and chances are the housewife will find her voice just as the jury has reached a verdict; she'll be the dissenting vote causing your deliberations to get hung up for another ??? days.

Have fun!

Post a comment